Nature&Fantasy
If we “human beings” make part of the nature, what we call fantasy, making part we, as our brain is made from the nature, then what imagine ourselves puo not to exceed the nature, if would be to the disopra of the nature would be supernatural.
Therefore in theory all the one which we imagine would have to exist, because our thoughts rientrono in the nature being be the same nature to create our brain.
Quindi quando qualcuno superficialmente, per minimizzare quello che dici, sostiene che si tratta di fantasie(come per dire non esiste quello che dici), entra in contraddizione, se la fantasia fa parte di noi e noi siamo stati creati dalla natura, allora sostenendo che quello che dici è sopra la natura, allora il soprannaturale dovrebbe esistere o viceversa facendo parte della natura non è sopranaturale ma naturale, quindi “real”.
According to this principo if we think to one what, for how much grotesque or improbable one, in theory it could exist, because our thought re-enters in the canoni of the nature same. (contradiction)
This door is made of the questions, than probably the superficial persons who with one word is convinced to cancel the truth, is not placed, concrete persons, but incoherent.
questions:
if all he is natural, then GOD makes part of the nature?
But if GOD does not exist, however we reason and understand we stessu, therefore the nature material understands if same?
If GOD makes part of the nature, is composed of one disowned matter?
Or as they say the GOD religions has created all and it is to the infuori of the nature? Therefore it is supernatural?
The matter (the molecules) becoming a member of between they create able beings to think, therefore matter has the tendency to become intelligentee to study if same. But when the matter disunisce, the acquaintances or the identities of the persons forgiveness in the null one?
